On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 3:32 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 08:52:25PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > There appears to be a typo, here: > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/history.html#:~:text=Postgres95%20code%20was%20completely%20ANSI%20C > . > > A word or two should be added between 'completely' and 'ANSI C', such as > > 're-written in', or 're-coded using', or some such. > > This is the current sentence, and it sounds kind of OK to me, FWIW: > "Postgres95 code was completely ANSI C and trimmed in size by 25%. > > I agree with the OP, that is missing something. Maybe: Between the 4.2 release and the release of Postgres95 the code was made to completely adhere to ANSI C and the size was reduced by 25%. David J.
