Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 7 Oct 2023, at 22:22, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yeah, either way has the same result. However, I wonder if we should
>> change this example to use current_user for clarity. It does look
>> more like it's intended to be a variable or column reference than
>> a built-in function.
> Agreed, and "user" is a hard search term to use for discovering what it is.
> +1
> for changing to current_user.
OK, I'll take care of this later today.
regards, tom lane
