On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 14:49 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I don't think that your proposed wording for this is an improvement.
Well, the existing wording is impenetrable even for someone with some PostgreSQL knowledge, like me. Yours, Laurenz Albe
On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 14:49 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > I don't think that your proposed wording for this is an improvement.
Well, the existing wording is impenetrable even for someone with some PostgreSQL knowledge, like me. Yours, Laurenz Albe