Ah, I just misread it. I think it's perfectly clear actually, I just went there looking for the default order (ASC/DESC) and skimmed the first line about ORDER BY. I must have interpreted "whatever order" to mean "whichever orientation of ordering".
Sorry about that. Zane ________________________________ From: David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 8:56:48 PM To: duffieldz...@gmail.com <duffieldz...@gmail.com>; pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org> Subject: Re: Inconsistent information on default ordering for ORDER BY clause On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 22:49, PG Doc comments form <nore...@postgresql.org> wrote: > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-select.html > Description: > > At the top of the sql-select page it says > > "If ORDER BY is not given, the rows are returned in whatever order the > system finds fastest to produce." > > but later it says > > "Optionally one can add the key word ASC (ascending) or DESC (descending) > after any expression in the ORDER BY clause. If not specified, ASC is > assumed by default." > > The first statement implies that you cannot rely on the default ordering, > but the second implies that you can (and it will be ASC). Perhaps you're going wrong in the last sentence in the latter fragment where it says "If not specified". This is talking about ASC/DESC rather than the ORDER BY. Maybe that could be made more clear. Something like "If ASC or DESC is not specified, ASC is assumed by default". Would that make it more clear? David
