On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 08:21 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > No objections to using export over backup, but it does make the use of > "restore" feel awkward as that's generally an operation on a backup and not an > export. > > - least one schema/table in the backup file. > + least one schema/table in the file to be restored. > > Would it make sense to use "import" in some cases instead?
What about calling it "dump file" instead of "file to be restored"? Yours, Laurenz Albe
