Yes, this change is clear to me that the "columns added" applies to the
table on the publisher.

Regards,
Koen De Groote

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 7:57 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:54 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 8:04 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> > > > >
> > > > > Page:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/logical-replication-col-lists.html
> > > > > Description:
> > > > >
> > > > > The documentation on this page mentions:
> > > > >
> > > > > "If no column list is specified, any columns added later are
> automatically
> > > > > replicated."
> > > > >
> > > > > It feels ambiguous what this could mean. Does it mean:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1/ That if you alter the table on the publisher and add a new
> column, it
> > > > > will be replicated
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/ If you add a column list later and add a column to it, it will
> be
> > > > > replicated
> > > > >
> > > > > In both cases, does the subscriber automatically create this
> column if it
> > > > > wasn't there before?
> > > >
> > > > ~~~~
> > > >
> > > > I think the following small change will remove any ambiguity:
> > > >
> > > > BEFORE
> > > > If no column list is specified, any columns added later are
> > > > automatically replicated.
> > > >
> > > > SUGGESTION
> > > > If no column list is specified, any columns added to the table later
> > > > are automatically replicated.
> > > >
> > > > ~~
> > > >
> > > > I attached a small patch to make the above change.
> > >
> > > A small recommendation:
> > > It would enhance clarity to include a line break following "If no
> > > column list is specified, any columns added to the table later are":
> > > -   If no column list is specified, any columns added later are
> automatically
> > > +   If no column list is specified, any columns added to the table
> > > later are automatically
> > >     replicated. This means that having a column list which names all
> columns
> >
> > Hi Vignesh,
> >
> > IIUC you're saying my v1 patch *content* and rendering is OK, but you
> > only wanted the SGML text to have better wrapping for < 80 chars
> > lines. So I have attached a patch v2 with improved wrapping. If you
> > meant something different then please explain.
> >
>
> Your patch is an improvement. Koen, does the proposed change make
> things clear to you?
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
>

Reply via email to