Yes, this change is clear to me that the "columns added" applies to the table on the publisher.
Regards, Koen De Groote On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 7:57 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:54 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 8:04 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > > > > > > > > > Page: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/logical-replication-col-lists.html > > > > > Description: > > > > > > > > > > The documentation on this page mentions: > > > > > > > > > > "If no column list is specified, any columns added later are > automatically > > > > > replicated." > > > > > > > > > > It feels ambiguous what this could mean. Does it mean: > > > > > > > > > > 1/ That if you alter the table on the publisher and add a new > column, it > > > > > will be replicated > > > > > > > > > > 2/ If you add a column list later and add a column to it, it will > be > > > > > replicated > > > > > > > > > > In both cases, does the subscriber automatically create this > column if it > > > > > wasn't there before? > > > > > > > > ~~~~ > > > > > > > > I think the following small change will remove any ambiguity: > > > > > > > > BEFORE > > > > If no column list is specified, any columns added later are > > > > automatically replicated. > > > > > > > > SUGGESTION > > > > If no column list is specified, any columns added to the table later > > > > are automatically replicated. > > > > > > > > ~~ > > > > > > > > I attached a small patch to make the above change. > > > > > > A small recommendation: > > > It would enhance clarity to include a line break following "If no > > > column list is specified, any columns added to the table later are": > > > - If no column list is specified, any columns added later are > automatically > > > + If no column list is specified, any columns added to the table > > > later are automatically > > > replicated. This means that having a column list which names all > columns > > > > Hi Vignesh, > > > > IIUC you're saying my v1 patch *content* and rendering is OK, but you > > only wanted the SGML text to have better wrapping for < 80 chars > > lines. So I have attached a patch v2 with improved wrapping. If you > > meant something different then please explain. > > > > Your patch is an improvement. Koen, does the proposed change make > things clear to you? > > -- > With Regards, > Amit Kapila. >