On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 14:33, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Maybe better: > > Other possibilities will be excluded for lack of join clauses. > (In reality, use of EquivalenceClasses would allow us to > deduce additional join clauses that allow more join > combinations, but here we ignore that to preserve the > simplicity of this example.)
Looks good to me. David
