Thank you for your feedback, Daniel.
My thoughts are below:
/- Change the definition of a replication slot. + Changes the definition
of a replication slot. Reading this page it seems we are mixing tense in
many places, some say "Change the" and "Read some" and elsewhere we use
"Drops the". Maybe a more holistic approach would be better for this
page to improve consistency? /I agree, let's add "s" in all cases for the sake of consistency.
/- Not enabled by default because it is resource intensive. + Not
enabled by default because it is resource-intensive. We use both
spellings in multiple places, shouldn't all be changed?/
Agreed, changing all instances to "resource-intensive".
/- <command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions. + the
<command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions. ... -
<command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions. + the
<command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions. ... -
<command>COPY</command> and other functions which allow executing a +
the <command>COPY</command> command and functions, which allow executing
a I'm not sure about these, I think we use COPY without the the "the
COPY command" decoration in many places so I think it's more consistent
like this. /I actually think we should add the decoration here because "<command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions"
sounds a bit confusing since COPY is not a file-access function and we seem to
put it in the list. Even though I
agree that everybody knows COPY is a command, not a function.
/- to call functions defined in the standard internal library, by using
an + to call functions defined in the standard internal function library
by using an interface similar to their SQL signature. Isn't it a bit
redundant to say "internal function library" when we are already talking
about function definitions?/
I agree that it may seem redundant, I added "function" here for the sake of
consistency with lines 1829/1830 (if applied to the master branch)
where the documentation mentions "standard internal*function* library".
Please, let me know what you think of the last two points for me to send the
updated patch.
--
Oleg Sibiryakov
On 10.10.2025 10:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 10 Sep 2025, at 09:54, Oleg<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear all,
I have prepared a patch containing some minor inconsistencies in the
documentation. Please, take a look.
I will be looking forward to your feedback.
Thanks for the patch, while most of these are obvious improvements I have a few
comments on some:
- Change the definition of a replication slot.
+ Changes the definition of a replication slot.
Reading this page it seems we are mixing tense in many places, some say "Change
the" and "Read some" and elsewhere we use "Drops the". Maybe a more holistic
approach would be better for this page to improve consistency?
- Not enabled by default because it is resource intensive.
+ Not enabled by default because it is resource-intensive.
We use both spellings in multiple places, shouldn't all be changed?
- <command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions.
+ the <command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions.
...
- <command>COPY</command> and other file-access functions.
+ the <command>COPY</command> command and file-access functions.
...
- <command>COPY</command> and other functions which allow executing a
+ the <command>COPY</command> command and functions, which allow
executing a
I'm not sure about these, I think we use COPY without the the "the COPY
command" decoration in many places so I think it's more consistent like this.
- to call functions defined in the standard internal library, by using an
+ to call functions defined in the standard internal function library by
using an
interface similar to their SQL signature.
Isn't it a bit redundant to say "internal function library" when we are already
talking about function definitions?
The patch shall be applied to the REL_18_STABLE branch.
As you mentioned downthread, this is also for master. Our workflow is to
always apply to master and backpatch from there.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
