On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 16:42 +0400, Sergei Katkovsky wrote: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 2:36 AM Laurenz Albe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But perhaps it is really better to leave things as they are now, perhaps > > replacing "blank-trimming", perhaps as "variable-length string that ignores > > training blanks". > > Looks like nobody is against "insignificant/ignorable trailing > whitespace" or anything like that anymore? Am I right?
Any verbal description will never completely represent the facts. But I'd say that "ignores trailing blanks" (not tabs, for example) is a fairly accurate description. Yours, Laurenz Albe
