> On 4 Jun 2026, at 22:12, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:

> My big issue is that we explain the limitation of pg_checksums, but
> don't point readers at the tool that doesn't have that offline
> restriction.  I think we need that explicitly mentioned, and at the top.

How about something like the attached?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

Attachment: pg_checksums_docs.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to