On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 3:54 AM Matemática A3K <[email protected]> wrote: > In my terms, this would be something like "Accuracy was traded in > order to better convey the idea to the audience". I find this to be > valid although I don't share it nor I think the documentation is built > upon it, but this is just my opinion, thanks for sharing yours.
pgbench docs already describes random() as producing a "uniformly-distributed random integer". So I'm OK with explicitly stating that the distribution is uniform here as well. If we do that, I think it's better to use similar wording to keep the docs consistent. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
