On 30 Aug 2003 at 17:50, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't think we "decided" to add it, but no one has objected to the > > idea, except Peter recently. Does it make sense to have a security > > overview section in the documentation? > > I think it does. > > As I think Peter is trying to point out, you could almost get the same > result just by having a fat index entry under "security", but I think > people are more likely to notice a chapter or section in the Admin Guide > with such a title. Also, once we have such a chapter, we might find it > reads more naturally to move some of the existing discussions into it, > leaving only a cross-reference where the material is now.
So do we want this work or not? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
