Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:

In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
(almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?


I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend support.

Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.

Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a minute.

I have used xercess-C++ in my current project and I can tell you one thing. It's object model is broken.


It is a fine API in general but the way it's object model is broken, makes me hate it.. really..

Given a better choice I wouldn't use it. But I haven't used any other XML toolkits either. My XML experience is pretty limited..

Shridhar

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to