Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> A better approach for that would be to remove HISTORY from CVS and build 
> >>> it only when the release tarball is made.
> 
> > I think the only reason HISTORY and INSTALL are in CVS is because we
> > want people running CVS during beta to have changes docs and install
> > instructions that don't require them to pull down a new tarball each
> > time or read the docs via a web site.
> 
> That argument seems a bit silly for HISTORY, seeing that it's generally
> not up-to-date during beta testing.  As for INSTALL, those instructions
> don't change fast enough to surprise beta testers, so I'm not convinced
> about it either.

Actually, recent releases had a current HISTORY before beta started. 
However, if they are downloading the beta tarballs, the HISTORY/INSTALL
files are already generated.  It would only be useful for CVS pulls
during beta though.

One idea would be to replace file content with a single URL that points
to the development docs, then when the tarball is built, it can
overwrite those files.

Marc?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to