Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> You are confusing SQL and PL/pgSQL. > > > Any idea why they don't match between SQL and PL/pgSQL. > > Different lexers. > > We could talk about extending plpgsql's lexer to handle comments the > same way as the main SQL lexer, but it doesn't do so ATM. (Also, there > is compatibility with Oracle PL/SQL to think about before assuming such > a change must be a Good Thing...)
Yea, I was wondering about PL/SQL compatibility. Someone want to research that? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
