Now that I understand what's going on, I don't have a strong preference, but I'd say that either it needs noting in the documentation or it should be added to the grammar.
And if it isn't going to hit the grammar for 7.4.x, I'd be happy to supply a doc patch.
-tfo
On Sep 29, 2004, at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:That seems reasonable, too, although I was interested to learn that this (and a few other expressions) weren't actually functions.
They are functions ... but not from the point of view of the grammar, which has special productions for them to cope with SQL's whimsical syntax requirements.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly