On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 03:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Is anyone feeling masochistic and wants to review the SQL standards > conformance chapter in the documentation for SQL 2003?
Another useful improvement would be to update the "Standards conformance" section of the SQL command reference pages to refer to SQL:2003 consistently. At present they refer to a mix of SQL-92, SQL:1999, and SQL:2003. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings