FYI, this discussion about adding a separate array section to the docs (which we already have, as Peter pointed out) is independent of the ARRAY() documentation addition I just put in the patch queue.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:59:13PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 04:36:14PM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > Here's a little addition to the array functions & operators > > > section of the manual. It adds a function array() to the list. > > > > > > Cheers, D > > > > BTW, it seems it would be useful to dedicate a chapter to array > > handling, since it's something that's not very common amongst > > databases. > > I guess it depends what you mean. Oracle has "subtables," and other > things have stuff like that. Also, it's in the SQL standard... > > Anyhow, where do you think it should go? > > Cheers, > D > -- > David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ > phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 > > Remember to vote! > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
