Quoting Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Jeff Davis wrote: > > > Should the text include a mention of synchronous vs. > asynchronous? Or > > > does master-master imply synchronous? > > > > It shouldn't. It is possible to have synchronous replication > without it > > being master<->master. > > We could mention async vs sync but at the FAQ stage I think the > multi-master/master-slave disinction is enough. Let's see what > questions > we get. About all you can say is, it is not possible to implement synchronous master-master replication, because of conflict resolution of simultaneous transactions. -- "Dreams come true, not free." -- S.Sondheim, ITW
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
