Tom Lane wrote: > Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 1/3/06, pres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> i would find it helpful if Table 42-1 included a column that identified > >> whehter each catalog is shared or not. convenient, but given that the > >> documentation does contain it, not necessary. > > > is this acceptable or usefull? if so, i can do it after work... > > It seems like clutter to me. Whether a catalog is shared or not is not > necessarily the first thing you want to know about it.
I am thinking the table should be split into two, one for the global tables, and another for the db-local tables. I don't think we make it clear enough which tables are global. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
