Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not simply use the technical phrase: "SIGHUP" etc. We can just say
> 'these terms are shorthand for "......" '
> I'm not crazy about the terms but at least it is explicit and accurate.
> It would also allow us to have a much longer description of all of the
> implications and difficulties of each mode.
We have all that in the introductory section; the references made in the
per-variable descriptions really have no impact on how verbose the
introductory text is ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
