Markus Schiltknecht wrote: > Robert Treat wrote: > > On Monday 21 August 2006 09:47, Markus Schiltknecht wrote: > >> has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go > >> and what it should cover? > > > > I think the general idea is to toss it on techdocs... like the GUI Tools > > page... http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54 > > Hm. I didn't know that one. There is already a section about > replication. Chris, do you agree to put your article there? > > But AFAIK the goal of our discussion was to put _something_ into the > official documentation to make it better visible. Lots of people ask for > replication solutions, but up to now there is no official statement. So > newcomers need to google around, figure out about lots of different > projects, partly dead ones, etc... > > If we put an extensive replication article in the techdocs, we need to > link it somehow from the main documentatino, IMHO. Otherwise it probably > won't help that much.
I will work on a replication section for 8.2, similar to the XML docs I posted a few days ago. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
