Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jul 25, 2007, at 22:43 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I noticed the other day that if you are viewing the release notes for a
particular version that the prev / next links are wrong. E.g., If I am
reading 8.1.8 and want to read 8.1.9 I have to hit previous, instead of
next.
I think it's because the releases are listed newest first, so when you hit
next you're not getting the next release, but the next release notes. While
perhaps a bit confusing on the individual pages, I still think it's best to
have the release notes in reverse chronological order.
Yeah. It is confusing if you _think_ about it, but if you just use it,
it's fine (after all, we've been using it this way for years. I mean
even Joshua used to use it and not notice it was backwards).
Well yes and no. I noted that it was confused as soon as I started to
use previous and next. I normally don't do that.
J
Probably the only thing you could actually do about it is change the
text in the link so it said "previous release" (resp. "next release")
instead of "next" (resp. "previous"), but I have zero idea what it would
take. It's probably a lot more work than it's worth, if it's possible
at all.
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
