On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:10:31 -0400 (EDT) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just undo the whole thing. The project name is what it is.
> >
> > +1.
>
> Let's not get sidetracked here. There was already agreement in
> advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to
> discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not.
> If you want to bring up that issue, start a thread and try to get
> agreement on it.
>
Woah, let's be very clear here. There was zero agreement to promote the
name postgres. There was agreement to state that Postgres was an
acceptable form of the word PostgreSQL.
Which I do still agree with, but that is far from "promoting".
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
