On Nov 8, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to all of
the various solutions. This was a reason not to do that.

The reason for taking a "balanced approach" is that no one solution
fits everyone's needs.  I don't think the core docs should be pushing
Slony more than other solutions.

We do mention Slony for in-place upgrades because if its capabilities to
work across Postgres versions.

I'm pretty sure Skytools/Londiste works across versions too. Presumably, any replication that's not based on binary format should work.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to