On Nov 8, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to all ofthe various solutions. This was a reason not to do that.The reason for taking a "balanced approach" is that no one solution fits everyone's needs. I don't think the core docs should be pushing Slony more than other solutions.We do mention Slony for in-place upgrades because if its capabilities towork across Postgres versions.
I'm pretty sure Skytools/Londiste works across versions too. Presumably, any replication that's not based on binary format should work.
-- Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature