Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Honestly, I think you are underestimating this problem. > > > > > I fail to see why this is a major problem; and merely asserting that > > it is one isn't going to change my mind. Can you point to something > > like a major application that will be broken and can't easily be fixed? > > SQL-Ledger/LedgerSMB > > What I find interesting is that I (and Josh) are getting push back and > all we are trying to do is be a little louder about the change.
Adding extra warnings/notices is not a zero-cost action so there has to be justification to do it. Actually it is near-zero cost to use but not zero-cost to our users who have to read it multiple places. (Think dumb product warning labels.) What I have done is to move the item up to the top of our incompatibilities list in the release notes. That is near zero cost for everyone. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
