Erik wrote:
> > Hmm, wouldn't it be easier to provide the pgweb table?
>
> Maybe - I don't know what that pgweb data would be.
>
> There are really two issues:
>
> 1. Apply changes I suggested (and attached earlier) to
> the documentation text to make code examples use a
> single table instead of two different ones. I chose
> apod because I knew apod from tsearch2. In the patch
> there are also some confusing inconsistencies removed,
> for instance column 'textsearch_indexable_col' is in a
> later code example used as column 'textsearch'.
>
> 2. Whether or not to include some actual table data (be
> it apod or pgweb). This is less important as far as I am
> concerned.
>
> The first is more useful and easier to apply than the
> second.
Agreed. The data file you sent was 1.5MB of data uncompressed. That
isn't going in the docs.
I looked at adding just the schema you had:
CREATE TABLE apod (
title text,
body text,
sdate date,
keywords text,
id integer
);
but later saw that there were 'apod' references later in the docs that
mentioned columns that weren't in the CREATE TABLE, e.g., 'vector':
SELECT * FROM ts_stat('SELECT vector FROM apod')
ORDER BY nentry DESC, ndoc DESC, word
LIMIT 10;
Please send a patch that adds the CREATE TABLE in a consistent manner
and we will consider just that addition. Here is where I suggest you
add the CREATE TABLE in the patch:
<programlisting>
CREATE TABLE apod (
title text,
body text,
sdate date,
keywords text,
id integer);
-- insert some data
SELECT title, ts_rank_cd(textsearch, query) AS rank
FROM apod, to_tsquery('neutrino|(dark & matter)') query
WHERE query @@ textsearch
ORDER BY rank DESC LIMIT 10;
I am fine with you updating the later examples to be more consistent
too.
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
