On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just had questions from a replication user about why the .backup file is > > described as "can ordinarily be ignored" and is considered optional by > > recovery also even when pg_start_backup() was used. > > What it says is that the second part of the filename can ordinarily > be ignored. I don't know why neither he nor you managed to parse the > sentence correctly. Feel free to propose a rewording, but removing > information doesn't sound like a solution.
Its probably best to read the whole mail before commenting on other people's parsing. ;-) I'll do a patch. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
