Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8, > >> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something > >> like "Never released". Thoughts? > > > I think a mention in the 8.3.3 notes saying something like "the 8.3.2 > > version was never released to the public because it contained a bug" > > should be enough -- so all release note items should be for 8.3.3. > > The implication being that our other releases *don't* contain bugs?
No, the implication being that we learned of this bug and its severity just before the release was carried out in full. > Seems a bit wordy to me, and anyway I just finished committing them > the other way ... Just a matter of taste anyway, probably. I saw an announcements like that a couple of days ago, which is what prompted my suggestion. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
