Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Bruce, > >> > >>>> Currently, catalog-pg-class is a bit confusing as to where FKs are > >>>> tracked in pg_class. Please update the lines for relchecks and > >>>> reltriggers to read: > >>>> > >>>> relchecks int2 Number of check constraints on the > >>>> table (but not > >>>> other types of constraints); see pg_constraint catalog > >>> Uh, why do we have to say "but" when we clearly say "check constraints"? > >>> Do we need to say "CHECK" contraints? > >> Because I've encountered two people on IRC (and a client) who were > >> confused about this, and it confused me briefly when I fielded their > >> questions. Saying "CHECK constraints" would also probably do it, or > >> saying "check constraints (only)" > > > > Uppercase done, with <literal> tag. > > This is inconsistent with the rest of the documentation.
Should I use <emphasis>? <literal>? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
