On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[email protected]> writes: >> Bruce Momjian escreveu: >>> Do people feel we should continue documenting that Postgres pre-7.1 >>> didn't reference child tables by default? >>> >> No. IMHO we should remove references to unsupported releases from >> documentation. > > "Unsupported releases" is far too strict a criterion for this. For > example, there are demonstrably still people using 7.2 (we had a > question about it just last week). They will still appreciate these > notes when they get around to updating. > > Pre-7.1 might indeed be old enough to cut, but how much are we really > saving? Four sentences out of our current docs doesn't excite me ...
But since there's a doc set per version, it would make sense to stop mentioning unsupported versions in the docs for supported versions, no? Or is this a FAQ thing we're talking about? -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
