Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > What about: > > archive_command = 'test ! -f ...%f && cp %p ...%f' > > Perhaps, though I still think this isn't an improvement over the > original.
His complaint was that .../%f looks like ../%f; is that a valid concern? I have reverted the change. Also, should we be using test ! -e instead of -f? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
