Thanks, applied. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik Rijkers wrote: > 'anyways' is not correct english, I think... > > > > > --- doc/src/sgml/xtypes.sgml.orig 2010-04-06 02:48:33.000000000 +0200 > +++ doc/src/sgml/xtypes.sgml 2010-04-06 02:49:22.000000000 +0200 > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ > > <para> > If the alignment is unimportant (either just for a specific function or > - because the data type specifies byte alignment anyways) then it's possible > + because the data type specifies byte alignment anyway) then it's possible > to avoid some of the overhead of <function>PG_DETOAST_DATUM</>. You can use > <function>PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED</> instead (customarily hidden by > defining a <function>GETARG_DATATYPE_PP</> macro) and using the macros > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
