Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Robert Haas wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> OK, everyone seems to like requiring dia. > >>> > >>> I don't like it a bit. It's hard enough for people to build the docs as > >>> it is. > >> > >> Why should anyone build the docs? Its part of the tarball process, so the > >> only ppl that should be doing it are those coming from CVS, no ... ? > > > > People often built them to verify the SGML markup and to view the > > content/markup before submitting a doc patch. > > Good point ... so, part of the Makefile should be modified for a flag to > disable dia build? "make NO_DIA=yes" ? Or, maybe have it default to NO > and for the tarball build, I'd modify the script for building it?
I am afraid if we don't enable dia by default then we will end up with production documentation without images. I think we have to default dia to on, and give a reasonable error when it doesn't exist, and mention how to turn it off. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
