Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > On 2010/07/29 17:41, Michael Meskes wrote: > > I had a short look at the docs Satoshi-san put online and yes, I'm > > impressed. > > However, I won't be able to proof read them before September. But given that > > 9.1 development is just starting I see no problem in putting the docs into > > the > > archive be it cvs or git and improve if there if it really needs > > improvement. > > In my short check I didn't see anything major that needed to be changed. > > This > > of course implies that the new docs are available in a suitable format. > > Thank you all for your attention to the ecpg document work. > > Yes, I see some developers are too busy, so it's difficult to take time > to review such large amount of changes of the doc for now. > > I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September > to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest) > by some developers who are interested in this doc. > > I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review > and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take > an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period, > and it can be an effective way to merge this large change > if we can take time for such intensive work. > > Is this possible? Any suggestions?
I would like to help too. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
