On 25 August 2010 20:15, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> On 18 August 2010 21:53, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > >>>> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section >>>> of the Constraints page. While the information already exists >>>> on the CREATE TABLE, I don't think a brief mention on the page >>>> specifically concerning primary keys could hurt. >>>> >>>> So here's a patch to add it. Worth adding? >>> >>> <firstterm> is probably not appropriate here, because you are not >>> defining the term for the first time. >>> >> That is true. > > It looks like discussion died here. Do you want to propose a new > patch? (I'd be happy to give it a shot if you'd rather.)
Sure, go for it. :) > In any > event, we should probably mention this for all three constraint > types which automatically create an index: PRIMARY KEY, UNIQUE, and > EXCLUSION. Agreed, and I didn't actually think about the fact that exclusion constraints add indexes. -- Thom Brown Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
