On 27 August 2010 19:56, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Copied from another thread... > > Something I've noticed is an inconsistency in the SGML markup around > functions listed in tables. Sometimes the entire function signature > is considered to be the function, and other times it's just the > function name, with its parameters outside of the <function> tags. > > E.g.: > > <function>variance</function>(<replaceable > class="parameter">expression</replaceable>) > > vs > > <function>stddev_samp(<replaceable > class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)</function> > > Which way is correct? >
I've also noticed that a lot of the <screen> contents are indented as part of the markup, but when output in HTML, each space it recreated as it ends up in either <code> or <pre> tags. <programlisting> contents seem to have been intentionally entered so that they break with the indenting style so they're output correctly. Shouldn't tags such as <screen> follow the same style so that they can also avoid unintentional leading whitespace? -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
