On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 22:22, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 September 2010 18:26, Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> "Joshua D. Drake" <[email protected]> writes: >>> > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> >> As an example, do you think that anyone trying to read one of these >>> >> pages on a cell-phone-sized screen is going to thank you for taking up >>> >> some of his screen with this? >>> >>> > Not anymore than all the other stuff on the screen (like the search box, >>> > header and excess space between the breadcrumb, the title and the fast >>> > forward links). >>> >>> Uh, no, because that stuff is just at the top of the page; it doesn't >>> stay there while you scroll down. >> >> You may have missed the part where I said, it didn't move for me. :D >> >> Anyway, Thom is removing it so it doesn't really matter. >> >> JD > > I'm coming round to the idea that if we wanted such a table of > contents, we'd generate it on the page when building the docs rather > than running some ECMAScript. I've already got a basic contents thing
Yes, definite +1 on that if you can make that work. > showing on my version of the docs (see > http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/9.0/static/functions-xml.html ), > but I'm not happy with it. It looks out of place and there doesn't > seem to be any appropriate place to put the link to show it. (once you're happy with it, of course) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
