On sön, 2010-09-05 at 22:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > A very similar issue is already documented here: > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/infoschema-triggers.html > > That sort of annotation was my first thought, but we'd have to repeat > ourselves in multiple places because there are several views that are > affected by the constraint-name issue. (Come to think of it, isn't > triggered_update_columns also affected by the trigger-name issue?) > > Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor > the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a separate section. -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
