Hey Robert, Hmm. The existing text might be redundant, but I don't think it's > inaccurate. Since the rest of the section alternates back and forth > between the two terms, it seems like this might help to remind the > reader that they are effectively synonymous. > I am the reader and just a user of libpq, not a guru :-). I must admit that this is a trifle, but I think it's indeed inaccurate. Also I think, that it's inaccurate to call one function PQnfields() and another PQftablecol(). Yes, terms "field" and "column" are interchangeable, but (personally) I don't clearly understand why two functions named not monotonous. But all of the above is my personal point of view. So, just ignore it if you don't like it :-)
Regards, Dmitriy
