On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Hmm. I'm inclined to just remove that sentence. The fact that you >> can make the operation fail by pointing it at someplace where there's >> not a server listening doesn't really seem to merit a disclaimer. I >> think waiting IS a well-defined operation now; it just won't succeed >> if you configure it in a way that doesn't make sense. > > +1
On further review, removing only the first sentence doesn't seem very sensible - one of the two links is also present just a few lines up, and mentioning just the other one with no context seems pointless. So I'm just going to remove the whole paragraph. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
