On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: >> >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >>> remove tags. >> > >> >> Sorry, vague commit message (I forgot squash). >> > >> >> Can I will use git ammend to improve this message? >> >> Absolutely not. >> >> > How about git revert, instead? ?It's not apparent to me that these >> > changes were improvements. >> >> I'll buy that one. > > [ CC to docs, committers removed. ] > > Well, if we want to revert, then we have to add <literal> to all the > numbers used in our docs --- there was no logic in what we previously > had. Do we want that? > > Here is an example line I did not change: > > an otherwise idle connection. A value of 0 uses the system default. > > Do we want that 0 to appear in a fixed-width font via <literal>? > It is easy to do but we should decide.
[ removing -hackers from CC also, no need to cross-post ] Hmm. I'm starting to lean toward leaving this as you have it. Which way did we more commonly do it before you applied this patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
