On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: >> Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I have completed and committed my draft of the 9.1 release notes. ?They >>> > will be continually updated and improved as we reach final release. >>> > >>> > What information should we take from the alpha release notes, and do we >>> > feel the alpha release notes are close enough to the ones I drafted that >>> > we can try avoiding my full release note generation in the future? >>> >>> I took a crack at moving the useful details from the alpha release >>> notes into the regular ones, which I do believe are better overall >>> than the alpha ones. Feel free to adjust as needed. At this point, I >>> think we should nuke the alpha release notes; I don't see any value in >>> having two versions around. >> >> Agreed. > > Should we temporarily move the general disclaimers about alpha > releases into the main release notes, since I think we're going to > wrap alpha5 on Monday?
Bruce thought this approach made sense, so done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
