Daniele Varrazzo <[email protected]> writes: > when I wrote the docs for the GMP extension > (http://pgmp.projects.postgresql.org/) I started improving the syntax > highlight produced by pygments > (https://bitbucket.org/dvarrazzo/pygments-postgres) for the PostgreSQL > SQL dialect. I've also added specific lexers for PL/pgSQL and > interactive psql sessions. The lexer handles all the PG constructs, > has a list of keywords and datatypes parsed from the docs, and can > also dispatch the content of a $$ string to a different lexer based on > a related LANGUAGE keyword nearby (e.g. highlighting a PL/Python > function using the Python lexer). Here you can see the result on the > "regression document" I am using to develop the lexer:
> - http://pgmp.projects.postgresql.org/highlight/psql.html > - http://pgmp.projects.postgresql.org/highlight/postgres.html > Is there any interest in applying highlighted syntax to the html > rendering of the manual? FWIW, there are very few things in the world that I hate more than randomly multicolored text. Almost always, some of it is unreadable in a particular viewing context because of poor contrast. And as often as not, the stuff that does stand out isn't the most important parts of the text. So no, this isn't a direction I want to see the Postgres documentation take. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
