On Apr 17, 2011 1:32 AM, "Josh Kupershmidt" <schmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [CC'ing the -www list, since this affects the PDFs provided by the > website. Ugh, and resending without attachments since it looks like > the last attempt didn't make it to the list.] > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:15 AM, <gabriele.garugli...@infoblu.it> wrote: > > the 9.0.2 has them, but 9.0.3 pdf documentation is missing the bookmarks. > > When looking for something is a real pain having to always use find or > > switch back to TOC pages. > > > > Any chance that you can generate and republish a corrected doc? > > Hi Gabriele, > > Thanks for taking the time to report this, and sorry for the delay in > following up. Just to clarify what (I think) Gabriele is complaining > about, here [1] is a screenshot from the Okular viewer of the > 9.0.3 -A4 or -US PDFs from the website [2]. You can see that the > "Contents" pane in the top left is greyed out [3]. > > When I built these PDFs from the 9.0.3 tarball myself, the results > looked better [4]. Assuming this fixes Gabriele's problem, could we > update the website with the fixed versions [5] of the 9.0.3 PDFs?
Could this be because of the efforts to reduce the size of the pdf's that was implemented a while ago? > Also, I noticed that the page of PDFs is not consistent with the PDF > naming scheme wrt. minor version numbers. We provide e.g. > "postgresql-8.4.6-A4.pdf" and "postgresql-9.0-A4.pdf". Personally, I > like having the minor version number included, but could we just be > consistent either way? We have a standard now, 8.4 just predates it. The standard is without the minor version, and the reasining behind this is both that it decreases storage requiremenyåts and more imoortant that a new version doesn't invalidate all old links, both on our own sites and othets... /Magnus
