Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:15:50 -0300 2011: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: > > > > On lr, 2011-03-12 at 09:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >> OK, it is not something worthwhile, or just something you don't have > > > >> time for. If the later, can you give us a hint on how to fix it? > > > > > > > I'm not even sure what the actual action item is supposed to be. > > > > > > The last suggestion in the thread was to move the contrib docs up one > > > level in the hierarchy, ie each contrib module would get a chapter not a > > > sect1. > > > > I think we would have to move "Additional Supplied Modules" up into its > > own book, and then list each module. The problem is that there are 42 > > modules so that list is going to be pretty long in the table of > > contents. > > Also, most of the sections are pretty short. Making each of them a > chapter seems a waste. I think some of them deserve a full chapter > (dblink, citext?, hstore, intarray, ltree, pgbench, pgcrypto, pgtrgm?, > pg_upgrade, tablefunc), but most don't. (Some of the others could, > perhaps, get moved under "Reference"). > > Would it work to move only some?
I think moving some would be even worse than what we have now, unless you can propose some logic about why they would be split. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
