On 05/25/2011 01:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Please see this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1290465663-sup-9...@alvh.no-ip.org
Ah, now I see--I was running a CommitFest that week, so of course I
missed this message. Those are all good ideas.
The first thing I was considering was dropping some DEBUG2 level logging
about the various phases of the reindex into there.
That would take this system more or less to where autovacuum was in 8.1
(well, not quite that bad because you can change it locally, but still).
It seems to me we can do something a bit better than that.
Sure. Simon's command string idea might work better, and doing some
extra lock decoration as you suggested in the above thread would be
another level of improvement. We should pick up redesign later on the
main list. You can at least count me in as someone who wants to see
this improved now.
Back to the doc patch I submitted...is that a useful step toward making
this issue visible enough to users for now to help?
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US g...@2ndquadrant.com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
