Thom Brown wrote: > On 27 September 2010 15:29, Thom Brown <thombr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 18 July 2010 11:58, Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerr...@usit.uio.no> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Thom Brown wrote: > >> > >>> Okay, I just edited an existing dia file: pgclient_server.dia. ?All I > >>> did was change the font size of the text "client application" at the > >>> top of the diagram, and changed the properties of a line so the > >>> arrowhead was no longer on the end. ?I used dia 0.97.1 to edit the > >>> file. The result when saving is attached in the diff file. ?That's a > >>> lot of file changes for what I did. > >>> > >>> Thom > >>> > >> > >> Indeed. > >> > >> The only explanation I can find to this is that I used dia.0.96.1 to > >> generate the file and you have used 0.97.1 to edit it. > >> > >> Almost all changes are to the attributes: > >> ?<dia:rectangle val=.... > >> ?<dia:point val=.... > >> > >> I suspect that these changes have been done because 'something' have > >> changed between the two main versions in the way they deal with these > >> attributes :( > > > > Has anyone yet come up with a reliable and sensible format we can use? > > Obviously nothing for this happened in time to make it for 9.1. So > are diagrams still something we plan to have?
Agreed, we need to move forward with something, and I am afraid we got into bike-sheeting on this. Would someone please summarize the previous discussion so we can make some decisions and move forward? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
