On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Brendan Jurd <dire...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 June 2011 02:39, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Brendan Jurd <dire...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This is just a quick docs patch to add a link to the mention of the
>>> current_schemas function from 18.10.1. Statement Behavior.
>>
>> Your patch got mangled by my email client, but I committed what I
>> believe to be the same change.
>
> Thanks Robert, but I think you missed the other part of my posted
> patch, which was removing the trailing empty parens from the function
> name ("current_schema()" => "current_schema" in two places in that
> paragraph).
>
> The paragraph rationalising this, from my original post:
>
> --
> I also removed the parentheses after the function name as this was a)
> misleading the reader into thinking the function could be called
> without arguments and b) inconsistent with the style for referring to
> functions elsewhere in the chapter.
> --
>
> Was the exclusion deliberate?Nope, though I believe you mean current_schemas, rather than current_schema, which both exist and are different. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
