On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Gavin Flower > <gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote: >> /postgres-9.1/share/doc/html/manage-ag-overview.html >> In the folowing partagrasoh 'recommendable' should be 'recommended'. >> >> [...] >> Databases are physically separated and access >> control is managed at the connection level. If one PostgreSQL server >> instance is to house projects or users that should be separate and for the >> most part unaware of each other, it is therefore recommendable to put them >> into separate databases. If the projects or users are interrelated and >> should be able to use each other's resources, they should be put in the same >> database but possibly into separate schemas. >> [...] >> > > maybe it's because i'm not a natural english speaker but this sounds > like we are recommended to put the users in another database. probably > it is refering to the user's resources... maybe we can make it more > explicit?
The only thing that seems weird about it to me is that recommendable is a word that is almost never used by native English speakers. Or at least not the native English speakers I know. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
